Summative Assessment is the end result of all of the formative assessments, feedback, etc.... Summative assessments must be valid- are they measuring what we want them to measure? Summative assessments must be relibale- are they consistent in producing the score and assessment on students. And most importantly summative assessments must be secure and have security protocols in place.
This is a summative assessment for the end of my gifted endorsement program- teachers will complete this project- a Gifted-in-service Workshop/Video/Live Webinar after finishing all four classes. Attached are the directions and instructions as well as the rubric.
Floyd
County Schools
Gifted
Endorsement Program
Final
Culminating Project- Gifted In-Service Workshop/Video/Live Webinar
Instructions
*You are to develop a Workshop/Video/Live Webinar
for Regular Education Teachers at your school.
*This is to be a CULMINATING/Summative assessment
project- including all that you have learned in your four gifted endorsement
courses: Characteristics, Methods and Materials, Assessment, and Curriculum
Programming.
Outline for Workshop/Video/Live Webinar
1. This
can be done in a group. Make sure you present this to YOUR faculty, so if you
have folks in your group who are not from your school you will need to present
this to their schools, as well. Or send the link to your faculty. OR set up the
live webinar link, advertise and push it out to your faculty.
2. Make
your principal aware of this final assignment- set a date for this presentation
with your principal. You will need 20-30 minutes for this workshop or video or
webinar.
3. Your
administrator or gifted resource/lead teacher in your school will score you on
the rubric. Please give this to them ahead of time. When it is completed send
this to your gifted endorsement instructor via the courier. Make yourself a copy
and send original.
4. Make
your workshop interactive, hands-on, entertaining, and creative for your
teachers. Just a PowerPoint is NOT creative. Make it engaging!!!
5. Make
sure to include the following in your workshop:
A) State
and federal definitions of gifted
B) State
Multiple Criteria for eligibility- mental ability, achievement, motivation and
creativity
C) Characteristics
of gifted- stereotypes, myths, special populations
D) Materials
and Resources to use with gifted students including but not limited to books,
websites, games, etc.
E) Strategies
and best practices to utilize with gifted students- What works best for gifted
students?
F) Differentiation
strategies for gifted students- low prep, high prep, etc.
G) Assessment
for gifted students- What do we use to assess gifted students for eligibility
into FCS gifted program once they are in the program? How do we evaluate gifted
students?
H) Curriculum
Programming- What is FCS Gifted Education Program? Gifted Mission, Standards
for gifted, Framework for curriculum, Delivery Models we utilize, etc.
I)
Gifted in the regular classroom- What do
you do with gifted students in an otherwise heterogeneous classroom?- Tips for
teachers to use the next day with these students- helpful hints.
J)
Creative Workshop- Make your workshop
fun, entertaining, humorous, painless!!! Don’t just read to them or show a PPT.
Make this original, elaborate, and fun!
Floyd County Schools
Gifted Endorsement Program
Transition Level 6- Gifted
In-Service/Workshop/Video/Live Webinar
Assesses: Professional and Pedagogical Knowledge and Skills for Teacher
Candidates
Name:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
School/Faculty
Presenting this to: ___________________________________________ Date: ___________________________________
Gifted Teacher or Principal
Signature: _______________________________________________________________________________
|
Required Components
|
Does Not Meet Expectations
(0-4)
|
Meets Expectations
(5-7)
|
Exceeds Expectations
(8-10)
|
Score
|
Dispositions
|
Goals
|
Proficiencies
|
NAGC Standards
|
|
State
and Federal Definition of Gifted
|
No definition or little explanation was
given. Very vague and did not clarify.
|
Both definitions were given.
|
Both definitions were explained and
analyzed.
|
|
6
|
2
|
1
|
5
|
|
State
Multiple Criteria Rule for Eligibility
|
The criteria were not explained or
covered for each area.
|
The criteria were explained for each of
the four areas of eligibility.
|
The criteria were explained in depth and
made understandable for regular classroom teachers.
|
|
6
|
2
|
5
|
2
|
|
Characteristics
of Gifted Students- include myths, special population info, etc….
|
None to very few characteristics were
covered.
|
Characteristics were listed.
|
Characteristics were discussed and
elaborated upon including some myths of gifted education and special
populations of gifted students.
|
|
1, 3
|
1
|
1
|
1, 4
|
|
Materials/Resources
to Use with Gifted Students
*Websites,
books, hands-on, etc…
|
None to very few resources were covered.
|
Materials and resources were listed.
|
A variety of materials were listed
including websites, books, hands-on, ect. and given to the teachers.
|
|
2
|
1, 4
|
2, 3, 4
|
3
|
|
Strategies
to Utilize with Gifted Students
|
None to very few strategies were covered.
|
4 strategies/best practices were given to
teachers.
|
5 or more strategies/best practices were
given and elaborated upon.
|
|
5
|
1, 2
|
2, 3, 4
|
3, 6
|
|
Differentiation
for Gifted Students
|
None to very little was discussed about
differentiation.
|
3 tips for differentiation were
discussed.
|
4 or more differentiation tips were
discussed.
|
|
1, 2, 5
|
1, 3
|
2, 3
|
3
|
|
Assessment
of Gifted Students
*tests
Floyd County uses
*evaluation
in classroom
|
None to very little was discussed about assessment.
|
Assessment of gifted students and for
gifted students was listed.
|
Assessment of gifted students and for
gifted students was discussed and elaborated upon.
|
|
4
|
1, 5
|
5
|
2
|
|
Curriculum
Programming
*FCS
Mission
*FCS
Standards
*FCS
Framework
*FCS
Delivery Models
|
None to very little was discussed about
FCS gifted program.
|
FCS gifted program was listed.
|
FCS gifted program was discussed
including the mission, standards, framework, and delivery models.
|
|
6
|
1, 2, 3
|
2, 3
|
3, 5, 6
|
|
Gifted
in the Regular Classroom
|
None to very little was discussed about
teaching gifted students in the regular classroom.
|
Teaching gifted students in the regular
classroom was discussed.
|
Teaching gifted students in the regular
classroom was discussed and elaborated upon with tips for teachers to utilize
in their classroom.
|
|
8
|
5
|
1
|
1, 2
|
|
Creativity
of Workshop
|
None to very little creativity.
|
Some creative elements to the workshop.
|
The workshop was very creative- original,
humorous, and elaborate.
|
|
8
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
|
Total
Score
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does Not Meet Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
(0-69 points) (70-89 points) (90-100
points)
Comments:
